[av_section min_height=’75’ min_height_px=’500px’ padding=’default’ shadow=’no-border-styling’ bottom_border=’no-border-styling’ scroll_down=’aviaTBscroll_down’ id=’top-slider’ color=’main_color’ custom_bg=” src=’https://bari.cl/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/McCloskey-400×267.jpg’ attachment=’2096′ attachment_size=’medium’ attach=’scroll’ position=’top left’ repeat=’stretch’ video=” video_ratio=’16:9′ overlay_enable=’aviaTBoverlay_enable’ overlay_opacity=’0.8′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_pattern=” overlay_custom_pattern=”]
[av_one_full first]

[av_headline_rotator before_rotating=’CONFERENCIA DEIRDRE MCCLOSKEY‘ after_rotating=” multiline=’aviaTBmultiline’ interval=’3′ animation=” tag=’h2′ size=’63’ align=’left’ custom_title=’#ffffff’]
[av_rotator_item title=’HOTEL W’ link=” linktarget=” custom_title=’#808080′]
[av_rotator_item title=’06.OCT.2016′ link=” linktarget=” custom_title=”]
[av_rotator_item title=’08:30AM’ link=” linktarget=” custom_title=’#808080′]
[/av_headline_rotator]

[av_hr class=’custom’ height=’50’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’left’ custom_border=’av-border-fat’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’40px’ custom_margin_bottom=’40px’ icon_select=’no’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’]

[/av_one_full]
[/av_section]

[av_submenu which_menu=’custom’ menu=’24’ position=’center’ color=’header_color’ sticky=’aviaTBsticky’ mobile=’disabled’]
[av_submenu_item title=’Bio’ link=’manually,#bio’ linktarget=” button_style=”]
[av_submenu_item title=’Artículos’ link=’manually,#articulos’ linktarget=” button_style=”]
[/av_submenu]

[av_section min_height=” min_height_px=’425px’ padding=’default’ shadow=’no-shadow’ bottom_border=’no-border-styling’ id=’bio’ color=’main_color’ custom_bg=” src=” attachment=” attachment_size=” attach=’scroll’ position=’top left’ repeat=’no-repeat’ video=” video_ratio=’16:9′ overlay_opacity=’0.5′ overlay_color=” overlay_pattern=” overlay_custom_pattern=”]
[av_heading heading=’ACERCA DE CONFERENCISTA’ tag=’h4′ style=’blockquote modern-quote’ size=’40’ subheading_active=” subheading_size=’15’ padding=’0′ color=” custom_font=”][/av_heading]
[/av_section]

[av_section min_height=’custom’ min_height_px=’425px’ padding=’default’ shadow=’no-shadow’ bottom_border=’no-border-styling’ id=’bio’ color=’main_color’ custom_bg=” src=” attachment=” attachment_size=” attach=’scroll’ position=’top left’ repeat=’no-repeat’ video=” video_ratio=’16:9′ overlay_opacity=’0.5′ overlay_color=” overlay_pattern=” overlay_custom_pattern=”]

[av_one_third first min_height=” vertical_alignment=” space=” custom_margin=” margin=’0px’ padding=’0px’ border=” border_color=” radius=’0px’ background_color=” src=” background_position=’top left’ background_repeat=’no-repeat’]

[av_image src=’https://bari.cl/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/foto-oficial-DM-400×267.jpg’ attachment=’2112′ attachment_size=’medium’ align=’center’ animation=’no-animation’ styling=” hover=” link=” target=” caption=” font_size=” appearance=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’][/av_image]

[av_hr class=’custom’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-fat’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’40px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’no’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’]

[/av_one_third][av_two_third min_height=” vertical_alignment=” space=” custom_margin=” margin=’0px’ padding=’0px’ border=” border_color=” radius=’0px’ background_color=” src=” background_position=’top left’ background_repeat=’no-repeat’]

[av_tab_container position=’top_tab’ boxed=’border_tabs’ initial=’1′]
[av_tab title=’BIO‘ icon_select=’no’ icon=’ue800′ font=’entypo-fontello’]
Deirdre Nansen McCloskey (73) enseñó en *University of Illinois en Chicago economía, historia, inglés y comunicación desde el año 2000 al 2015. Ha escrito 17 libros, cerca de 400 publicaciones en tópicos que abarcan desde economía técnica y teoría estadística hasta promoción transgénero y las virtudes éticas de los burgueses.

La conferencista es conocida por ser una economista conservadora al estilo de los alumnos Chicago-School (ella fue académica del Departamento de Economía allí desde 1968 a 1980, y en Historia), pero de sí misma decía que era literalmente, cuantitativa, postmoderna, pro libre mercado, progresiva en temas episcopales, la mujer del medio oeste de Boston que fue una vez un hombre. Agregando, “no soy conservadora, Soy una cristiana libertaria”.

Con Stephen Ziliak en 2008 la experta escribió The Cult of Statistical Significance, que muestra que las pruebas de hipótesis nulas de “significación” son, en ausencia de una sustantiva función de pérdida, insignificantes. Su libro más reciente, publicado en enero de 2016 por la University of Illinois de Chicago Press –Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions, Enriched the World– argumenta por una “ideacional” explicación para el gran enriquecimiento de 1800 al presente.

Las Reforma y Revuelta en el noreste de Europa 1517-1789 condujeron a una nueva libertad y dignidad para la gente común -ideas llamadas “liberalismo”- las cuales produjeron a su vez una explosión del mejoramiento del “trade-tested”, “tener una oportunidad”.

El libro anterior en la trilogía, Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World (2010) han demostrado que las explicaciones materialistas como “saving” o “exploitation”, no tienen suficiente empuje económico o relevancia histórica. El primer libro en Bourgeois Era Trilogy, The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce (2006), estableció, contrario al clamor de la clerecía de izquierda y derecha desde 1898, que la burguesía era bastante buena. Y que el mejoramiento del “trade-tested” no es la peor escuela de ética.
[/av_tab]
[av_tab title=’PUBLICACIÓN‘ icon_select=’no’ icon=’ue800′ font=’entypo-fontello’]
(1.)  British Enterprise in the 19th Century

“Productivity Change in British Pig Iron, 1870-1939,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 82 (May 1968): 281-96.

• “Review of Birch’s British Iron and Steel,” Business History Review 43 (Fall 1969): 412-14.
• “The British Iron and Steel Industry,” summary of dissertation, Journal of Economic History 29 (Mar 1969): 173-75.

“Did Victorian Britain Fail?”  Economic History Review 23 (Dec 1970): 446-59.  Reprinted 2010 in Lars Magnusson, ed. Twentieth-Century Economic History: Critical Concepts in Economics (Oxford: Routledge).

• “Victorian Growth: A Rejoinder [to Derek Aldcroft],” Economic History Review 27 (May 1974): 275-77
• “No It Did Not: A Reply to Craft [to his Comment on ‘Did Victorian Britain Fail’?]”  Economic History Review 32 (Nov 1979): 538-41.
• “A Counterfactual Dialogue with William Kennedy on Late Victorian Failure or the Lack of It,” pp. 119-126 in McCloskey, Enterprise and Trade in Victorian Britain 1981 [1993].
• “Discussion” (of William Kennedy and William Phillips), Journal of Economic History 42 (Mar 1982): 117-118.

“International Differences in Productivity?  Coal and Steel in America and Britain Before World War I,” in Essays on a Mature Economy (1971), cited above, Chapter. 8, pp. 285-304.

• “An Exchange with David Landes,” pp. 305-309, in Essays on a Mature Economy (1971).

[co-authored with L. G. Sandberg] “From Damnation to Redemption: Judgments on the Late Victorian Entrepreneur,” Explorations in Economic History 9 (Fall 1971): 89-108.

• “Review of Sandberg’s Lancashire in Decline,” Journal of Political Economy 84 (Feb 1976): 198-200.
• “Review of Hannah’s The Rise of the Corporate Economy: The British Experience,” American Historical Review 82 (Dec, 1977): 1258-59.
• “Review of Matthews, Feinstein, and Odling-Smee, British Economic Growth 1855-1973,” Times Literary Supplement 462 (May 6, 1983):
• “Review of Kennedy’s Industrial Structure, Capital Markets, and the Origins of British Economic Decline,” Economic History Review 42 (Feb 1989): 141-143.
• “Is America in Decline?”  Des Moines Register, Sept 1990.  A revised version in The Key Reporter, 60 (2, Winter 1994-1995): 1-3.  Trans. and distributed by United States Information Service in Bangladesh.
• “Review of “Thurow’s The Zero-Sum Solution,” Des Moines Register, Jan 9, 1986.
• “Competitiveness and the Anti-Economics of Decline,” pp. 167-173 in McCloskey, ed., Second Thoughts: Myths and Morals of U.S. Economic History (Oxford 1992).

(2.)  British Foreign Trade in the 18th and 19th Centuries

“Britain’s Loss from Foreign Industrialization: A Provisional Estimate,” Explorations in Economic History  8 (Winter 1970-71): 141-52.

“Magnanimous Albion: Free Trade and British National Income, 1841-1881,” Explorations in Economic History 17 (July, 1980): 303-320; reprinted Forrest Capie, ed.  Protectionism in the World Economy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1992).

• “Reply to Peter Cain,” Explorations in Economic History 19 (Apr 1982): 208-210.

“From Dependence to Autonomy: Judgments on Trade as an Engine of British Growth.”  Pp. 139-154 in McCloskey, Enterprise and Trade in Victorian Britain (1981) (1993).

[co-authored with R. P. Thomas] “Overseas Trade and Empire, 1700-1820,” Chapter 4 in Floud and McCloskey, The Economic History of Britain, 1700-Present (1981), Vol. 1, pp. 87-102.

[co-authored with C. K. Harley] “Foreign Trade: Competition and the Expanding International Economy, 1820-1914,” Chapter 17 in Floud and McCloskey, The Economic History of Britain, 1700-Present (1981), Vol. 2, pp. 50-69; reworked in the second edition; Harley used it in Floud and Johnson, eds..

(3.)  The History of International Finance

• “Review of Ramsey’s The Price Revolution in 16th Century England,” Journal of Political Economy  80 (Nov/Dec, 1972): 1332-35.

[co-authored with J. Richard Zecher] “How the Gold Standard Worked, 1880-1913,” in J.A. Frenkel and H. G. Johnson, eds., The Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments (Allen and Unwin, 1976), pp. 357-385; reprinted as pp. 63-80 in B. Eichengreen, ed., The Gold Standard in Theory and History (Methuen, 1985).

[co-authored with J. Richard Zecher] “The Success of Purchasing Power Parity: Historical Evidence and Its Implications for Macroeconomics,” in Michael Bordo and Anna J. Schwartz, eds., A Retrospective on the Classical Gold Standard 1821-1931(NBER, University of Chicago Press, 1984), pp. 121-150.

• “Mars Collides with Earth, review of Volcker and Gyohten’s Changing Fortunes: The World’s Money and the Threat to American Leadership,” Reason, 24 (10, Mar 1993): 60-62.

{“The Extent of the Market: Market Integration in World History.”  For Lerici Conference on the Market in History, Apr 1993, unpublished.}

• “The Gulliver Effect,” Scientific American  (Sept 1995): 44.  Used as a text in the Law School Aptitude Test (LSAT).
• “Review of Gray’s False Dawn and Friedman’s The Lexus and the Olive Tree,” Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 9(1), Winter 2000.

• “Review of Niall Ferguson, The Cash Nexus.”  The American Scholar.  Spring 2001.
• Brief preface, “Globalization and the Money Market,” for an edited volume of the Athenian Policy Forum Conference (N. Lash, ed.);  2001.

(4.)  Open Fields and Enclosure in England

{I intend, beginning in 2015 and publishing perhaps in 2016, to gather these and also unpublished research into a book, The Prudent and Faithful Peasant}

“The Enclosure of Open Fields: Preface to a Study of Its Impact on the Efficiency of English Agriculture in the Eighteenth Century,” Journal of Economic History 32 (1, Mar, 1972): 15-35.

• “Review of Williams’ Draining of the Somerset Levels,” Journal of Economic History 32 (4, Dec, 1972): 1021-23.

“The Persistence of English Common Fields,” in E. L. Jones and William Parker (eds.), European Peasants and Their Markets: Essays in Agrarian Economic History (Princeton University Press, 1975), pp. 73-119.

“The Economics of Enclosure: A Market Analysis,” in Jones and Parker, as cited, pp. 123-160.

“English Open Fields as Behavior Towards Risk,” Research in Economic History 1 (Fall 1976): 124-170.

• “Fenoaltea on Open Fields: A Comment,” Explorations in Economic History  14 (Oct 1977): 402-404.
• “A Reply to Professor Charles Wilson,” Journal of European Economic History  8 (Spring 1979): 203-207.
• “Another Way of Observing Open Fields: A Reply to A. R. H. Baker,” Journal of Historical Geography   5 (Oct 1979): 427, 427-29.
• “Scattering in Open Fields: A Comment on Michael Mazur’s Article,” Journal of European Economic History 9 (Spring, 1980): 209-214.
• “Review of Popkin’s The Rational Peasant  and Macfarlane’s The Origins of English Individualism,”  Journal of Political Economy, 89 (August 1981): 837-40 [reprinted in UCLA Writing Program and in Ellen Strenski, ed., Cross-Disciplinary Conversations about Writing (NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1989)].
• “Comment on Petras and Havens’ ‘Peasant Behavior and Social Change–Cooperatives and Individual Holdings.’“  Pp. 226-231 in Clifford S. Russell and N.K. Nicholson, eds.  Public Choice and Rural Development, Washington, D.C., 1981.

“Theses on Enclosure,” pp. 56-72 in Papers Presented to the Economic History Society Conference at Canterbury, 1983.  Agricultural History Society.

[co-authored with John Nash] “Corn at Interest: The Extent and Cost of Grain Storage in Medieval England,” American Economic Review 74 (Mar 1984): 174-187.

• “Conditional Economic History: A Reply to Komlos and Landes,”  Economic History Review  44 (1, Feb 1991): 128-132.
• “Review of Turner’s, English Enclosures,” Journal of Economic History  1982
• “Open Field System,” brief entry in Eatwell, Milgate, and Newman, eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economic Thought and Doctrine (Macmillan U.K., 1987).

“The Open Fields of England: Rent, Risk, and the Rate of Interest, 1300-1815,” in David W. Galenson, ed., Markets in History: Economic Studies of the Past  (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 5-51.

“The Prudent Peasant: New Findings on Open Fields.”  Journal of Economic History  51 (2, June 1991): 343-355.

{“Allen’s Enclosure and the Yeoman: The View from Tory Fundamentalism.”}

{{Other draft chapters in a long unfinished book on the subject, begun in the 1970s, and to be finished in 2016!}}

(5.)  The Industrial Revolution and the Great Enrichment

[see also books: the second volume of the trilogy, The Bourgeois Era, Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World, 2010; and the concluding volume, Bourgeois Equality: How Betterment  Became Virtuous, 1600-1848, and Then Suspect (forthcoming perhaps late 2015), a full and nearly final draft is available from me February 2, 2015 for your private use.}

• “Review of Hohenberg’s Economic History of Europe,” Kyklos  (Nov 1971): 147.
• “Review of Hawke’s Railways and Economic Growth in England and Wales, 1840-1870,” Economic History Review  24 (Aug 1971): 493-95
• “Review of Hughes’ Industrialization and Economic History: Theses and Conjectures,”  Journal of Modern History  44 (Mar 1972): 97-8.
• “Review of Davis, Easterlin, Parker et al., American Economic Growth: An Economist’s History of the United States,” Journal of Economic History  32 (Dec 1972): 963-66.
• “Review of Williamson’s Late Nineteenth-Century American Development,” Times Literary Supplement  (Dec 12, 1975):
• “Review of David’s Technology and Nineteenth-Century Growth,” Economic History Review 29 (May 1976): 340-42.
• “Review of Reed’s Investment in Railways in Britain,” American Historical Review  82 (Feb 1977): 102.
• “Review of Coleman’s The Economy of England, 1450-1750,” Journal of Economic Literature  16 (Mar, 1978): 108-110.

“The Industrial Revolution, 1780-1860: A Survey,” Chapter 6 in Floud and McCloskey eds., The Economic History of Britain, 1700-Present  (1981), Vol. 1, pp. 103-127, reprinted in J. Mokyr, ed. Economic History and the Industrial Revolution  (Rowman and Littlefield, 1985).

• “Review of Rosenberg and Birdzell’s How the West Grew Rich,” New York Times Sunday Book Review, Feb 1986.
• “Beyond the Margin, review of Joel Mokyr’s The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress.”   Reason 22 (10, Mar 1991): 56-57.
• “Review of Robert Reich’s The Work of Nations.”  Chicago Tribune Book World, Mar 10, 1991, p. 3.

“The Industrial Revolution: A Survey,” a new essay, in Floud and McCloskey, eds., The Economic History of Britain, 1700-Present, 2nd ed., 1994.

• “Once Upon a Time There was a Theory,” Scientific American (Feb 1995): 25.
• “Squashing the Politically Correct in History (review of David Landes, Wealth and Poverty of Nations),” Reason, June 1998 

“1066 and a Wave of Gadgets: The Achievements of British Growth,” in Penelope Gouk, ed., Wellsprings of Achievement: Cultural and Economic Dynamics in Early Modern England and Japan (Variorum, 1995).

• “Industrial Revolution,” 2000 word essay in Ronald Hamowy, ed., Encyclopedia of Libertarianism.  2008
• “You Know, the Rich Are Different: A Comment on Clark’s Farewell to Alms,” European Economic History Review, 2008

“The Prehistory of American Thrift.”  Pp. 61-87 in Joshua J. Yates and James Davidson Hunter, eds., Thrift and Thriving in America:  Capitalism and Moral Order from the Puritans to the Present.  New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

“Thrift as a Virtue, Historically Criticized.” Revue de Philosophie Economique (Dec 2007):

• “Review of Joel Mokyr’s The Enlightened Economy.”  History Today, May 2010

“Tunzelmann, Schumpeter, and the Hockey Stick.”  Research Policy 42 (March 2013): 1706-1715.  (With material from Bourgeois Equality.)

“Why Economics Cannot Explain the Modern World.”  Economic Record 89 (June, 2013; Supplement S1): 8-22.  (With material from Bourgeois Dignity)

(6.)  Other Historical Subjects

“New Perspectives on the Old Poor Law,” Explorations in Economic History 10 (Summer 1973): 419-436.

• “Review of “Wrigley’s (ed.), Nineteenth Century Society and Singer’s and Small’s The Wages of War, 1816-1965,” Journal of the American Statistical Association  (Mar, 1974):
• “A Mismeasurement of the Incidence of Taxation in Britain and France, 1715-1810,” Journal of European Economic History 7 (1, Spring 1978): 209-10.
• “Comment on Hartwell’s ‘Taxation During the Industrial Revolution’,” Cato Journal  1 (1, Spring 1981): 155-159.
• “Little Things Matter, review of Robert W. Fogel, Without Consent or Contract,” Reason  22 (2, June 1990): 51-53.

“Women’s Work in the Market, 1900-2000,” in Ina Zweiniger-Bargielowska, ed., Women in Twentieth Century Britain: Economic, Social and Cultural Change.  London: Longman/Pearson Education, 2001 [also in Feminist Economics, below]

• “Review of Anne Goldgar, Tulipmania: Money, Honor, and Knowledge in the Dutch Golden Age.“  Business History Review 82 (Special issue 4, 2008):  891-894.
• “Keukentafel Economics and the History of British Imperialism.”  South African Economic History Review 21 (Sept, 2006): 171-176.

“Measured, Unmeasured, Mismeasured, and Unjustified Pessimism: A Review Essay of Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century.”  Erasmus Journal of Philosophy and Economics Dec 2014.

(7.)  Teaching Economics

[See also the economics textbooks, The Applied Theory of Price 1983, 1985 and (co-authored with Klamer and Ziliak) The Economic Conversation, forthcoming; and in Section 7 above, “The Economics of Choice” in  Rawski, ed., 1995]

• “9th Edition of Samuelson’s Economics,”  Challenge 16 (Sept/Oct 1973): 65-66.

[with John Siegfried, Robin Bartlett, W. Lee Hansen, Allen Kelley, and Thomas Tietenberg] “The Status and Prospects of the Economics Major,”  Journal of Economic Education 22 (3, Summer 1991): 197-224.

[with John Siegfried, W. Lee Hansen, Robin Bartlett, Allen Kelley, and Thomas Tietenberg] “The Economics Major: Can and Should We Do Better than a B-?”  American Economic Review  81   (2, May 1991): 20-25.  Reprinted Revista Asturiana de Economia 2008.

• “Why Economics is Tough for Ten-Year-Olds,” Social Studies Review (American Textbook Council)  10  (Fall 1991): 8-11.
• “The Natural,” Eastern Economic Review 18 (2, Spring 1992): 237-239.  Also in Eastern columns below.
• “Contribution to Special Book Section on books to recommend to undergraduate economics Students,” Reason 26 (7, Dec, 1994): 42.
• “Yes, There is Something Worth Keeping in Microeconomics.”  2002. Post-Autistic Economics Review  no. 16   4 Sept.  Reprinted in a German translation, “Ja, es gibt etwas Behaltenswertes an der Mikroökonomik,” in T. Dürmeier, T. v. Egan-Krieger, H. Peukert ,eds., Die Scheuklappen der Wirtschaftswissenschaft: Postautistische Ökonomik für eine pluralistische Wirtschaftslehre  (October 2006)
• [with Arjo Klamer and Stephen Ziliak] “Is There Life after Samuelson’s Economics?  Changing the textbooks.”  Post-Autistic Economics Review 42,  18 May 2007: 2-7.
• [with Helen Roberts] “What Economics Should We Teach Before College, If Any?” Journal of Economic Education summer, 2012.

(8.)  Teaching Writing in Economics

“Economical Writing,” Economic Inquiry 24(2) (Apr 1985): 187-222 [reprinted in UCLA Writing Program {Ellen Strenski, ed.}, Cross-Disciplinary Conversations about Writing (NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1989)]; reprinted with revisions as The Writing of Economics (in second ed., Economical Writing, 1999).

• a.) “Reply to Jack High”, Economic Inquiry, late 1980s
• b.) “Writing as a Responsibility of Science: A Reply to Laband and Taylor,” Economic Inquiry 30 (Oct 1992): 689-695.

(9.)  Criticism in History and Economic History

“The New Economic History: An Introduction,” Revista Storica Italiana (Mar, 1971: 5-22; in Italian); and Revista Espanola de Economia  (May-Aug 1971) in Spanish).

• “Introduction” to special issue of Explorations in Economic History 11 (Summer, 1974): 317-324.
• “The New Economic History in Britain” (in Italian), Quaderni Storici 31 (Dec 1976): 401-08.

“Does the Past Have Useful Economics?”  Journal of Economic Literature 14 (June 1976): 434-61.  Translated into Russian for Thesis 1 (1, Spring 1993): 107-136.  Reprinted in Diana Betts and Robert Whaples, eds. Readings in American Economic History, 1994.

“The Achievements of the Cliometric School,”  Journal of Economic History 38 (1, Mar, 1978): 13-28.

“The Problem of Audience in Historical Economics: Rhetorical Thoughts on a Text by Robert Fogel,”  History and Theory  24 (1, 1985): 1-22.  Reprinted  in Tidskrift för Skandinavisk Retorikforskning 53 (2010): 12-35.

• “Review of Boland’s The Foundations of Economic Method,” Journal of Economic Literature 23 (June 1985): 618-19.

[co-authored with Allan Megill]  “The Rhetoric of History.”  Pp. 221-238 in Nelson, Megill, and McCloskey, eds.  The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences (University of Wisconsin Press, 1987).

• “Counterfactuals,” article in Eatwell, Milgate, and Newman, eds.  The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economic Thought and Doctrine (Macmillan, 1987).
• “Continuity in Economic History,” article in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economic Thought and Doctrine (Macmillan, 1987), pp. 623-626.

“The Storied Character of Economics,” Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 101 (4, 1988): 543-654.

• “Reply to Professor Klein.” Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 102 (1989): 66-67.

“History, Differential Equations, and the Problem of Narration,”  History and Theory  30 (1, 1991): 21-36.

“Ancients and Moderns” [presidential address, Social Science History Association, Washington, D.C., 1989].  Social Science History, 14 (3, Jan 1991): 289-303.

• “Introduction” to McCloskey and Hersh, eds. A Bibliography of Historical Economics to 1980, Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. ix-xii.

“Kinks, Tools, Spurts, and Substitutes: Gerschenkron’s Rhetoric of Relative Backwardness,” Chapter 6 in Richard Sylla and Gianni Toniolo, eds. Patterns of European Industrialization: The Nineteenth Century (London: Routledge, 1991).

• “Looking Forward into History.”  Introduction (pp. 3-10) to McCloskey, ed., Second Thoughts: Myths and Morals of U.S. Economic History  (Oxford, 1992).

“The Economics of Choice: Neoclassical Supply and Demand,” in Thomas Rawski, ed., Economics and the Historian (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1995): 122-158.

[co-authored with Santhi Hejeebu] “The Reproving of Karl Polanyi,” Critical Review 13 (Summer/Fall 1999): 285-314.

• [co-authored with Santhi Hejeebu] “Polanyi and the History of Capitalism: Rejoinder to Blyth.” Critical Review. 16(1).  2004: 135-142.
• “Review of Floud and Johnson, The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Times Higher Education Supplement 15 January 2004.
• “One More Thing: An Amiable Reply to Whaples.”  Historically Speaking.  April 2010. November 9, 2012
• “The Poverty of Boldizzoni: Resurrecting the German Historical School.”  (in English) in Investigaciones de Historia Económica, Feb, 2013
• “The Captivating Fogel.”  300-word Letter, Intellectual Capital (Chicago Booth School of Business publication), fall, 2013.

(10.)  Rhetorical Criticism in Economics

[ See also Replies to Reviews of The Rhetoric of Economics, below; and The Rhetoric of Economics 1985 (1998), If You’re So Smart 1990, Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics 1994, The Vices of Economists 1997, How to Be Human* *Though an Economist  2000, The Secret Sins of Economics  2002]

“The Rhetoric of Economics,” Journal of Economic Literature  31 (June 1983): 482-517; reprinted in B. J. Caldwell, ed., Appraisal and Criticism in Economics  (Allen and Unwin, 1985); reprinted in Daniel Hausman, ed. The Philosophy of Economics, Readings, 1st and 2nd  eds.  [reprint of] “The Rhetoric of This Economics,” Chp. 4, pp.  38-52 in McCloskey, Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics (1994), for Daniel Hausman, ed.  the Philosophy of Economics, Readings, 3rd ed., 2007.  Reprinted in P. Atkinson and S. Delamont. eds., Representing Ethnography London: SAGE Publications, 2008.

Translated into

Japanese, Contemporary Economics  61 (Spring 1985), pp. 156-184;

French by F. Regard, as pp. 63-126 in Ludovic Frobert, “Si vous êtes si malins. . .” McCloskey et la rhétorique des economists.  Lyon: ENS Éditions 2004 for École normale supérieure Lettres et sciences humaines.  Lyon;

Hungarian for the journal Replika, apparently late 2006;  

Translated into Russian “Istoki” (“Headwaters”), Higher School of Economics, 2009.  

Russian  again translated,  “Ritorika ekonomicheskoy teorii “// Avtonomov V. , Ananyin O., Boldyrev I., Vasina L., Makasheva N. (eds.) ISTOKI: sociokulturnaya sreda ekonomicheskoy deyatelnosti i ekonomicheskogo poznaniya. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Press, 2011. pp. 252-320.   

• “Reply to Caldwell and Coats,” Journal of Economic Literature  22 (June 1984): 579-80.
• “Sartorial Epistemology in Tatters: A Reply to Martin Hollis,” Economics and Philosophy  1 (Apr 1985): 134-137.

“The Character of Argument in Modern Economics: How Muth Persuades,” in Proceeding of the Third Summer Conference on Argumentation, sponsored by the Speech Communication Association and the American Forensic Association, Annandale, Va., Fall 1983, revised for The Rhetoric of Economics.

”The Literary Character of Economics,” Daedalus  113 (3, Summer 1984): 97-119.  Three pages reprinted as pp. 20-22 in Mary M. Gergen and Kenneth J. Gergen, Social Construction: A Reader (London and Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003).

• “A Conversation with McCloskey About Rhetoric” Eastern Economic Journal, (Oct-Dec 1985): 293-296.
• “The Rhetoric of Economics,” Social Science 71 (2/3, Fall 1986): 97-102 (prepared by Frank Moore from a talk at the Institute in Social Science, University of North Carolina, Jan 1986).
• “Economics as a Historical Science.”  Pp. 63-69 in William Parker, ed. Economic History and the Modern Economist (NY: Basil Blackwell, 1986; Italian translation, 1988, Liters Editore).
• “Rhetoric,” in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economic Thought and Doctrine (Macmillan, 1987).  
• ”The Rhetoric of Economic Development: Rethinking Development Economics,” Cato Journal 7 (Spring/Summer 1987): 249-54; reprinted with minor revisions in James Dorn and A. A. Walters, eds. The Revolution in Development Economics,  1993.

“Towards a Rhetoric of Economics,” pp. 13-29 in G. C. Winston and R. F. Teichgraeber III, eds., The Boundaries of Economics, Murphy Institute Studies in Political Economy.  Cambridge University Press, 1988.

“Thick and Thin Methodologies in the History of Economic Thought.”  Pp. 245-257 in Neil de Mari, ed., The Popperian Legacy in Economics  (Cambridge University Press, 1988).

[co-authored with Arjo Klamer] “Economics in the Human Conversation,” pp. 3-20 in Klamer, McCloskey, and Solow, eds., The Consequences of Rhetoric  (Cambridge University Press, 1988).

“The Consequences of Rhetoric,” pp. 280-294 in Klamer, et al. eds.,  The Consequences of Rhetoric,  Cambridge University Press, 1988 [reprinted in Fundamenta Scientiae  9 (2/3, 1988): 269-284 (a Brazilian journal)].

“Their Blackboard, Right or Wrong: A Comment on Contested Exchange.”  Politics and Society 18 (2, June 1990): 223-232.

“Storytelling in Economics.”  Pp. 5-22 in Christopher Nash and Martin Warner, eds., Narrative in Culture  (Routledge 1990); and pp. 61-75 in Don C. Lavoie, ed. Economics and Hermeneutics (Routledge 1990).  An earlier version, with discussion, appeared in Orace Johnson, ed. Methodology and Accounting Research: Does the Past Have a Future (Proceedings of the 8th Annual Big Ten Accounting Doctoral Consortium, May, 1987: 69-76).  Reprinted as “Telling Stories Economically,” The Ludwig von Mises Lecture Series: Economic Education: 22: 83-107.

“Formalism in Economics, Rhetorically Speaking,”  Ricerche Economiche  43 (1989), 1-2 (Jan-June): 57-75.  Reprinted with minor revisions in American Sociologist 21 (1, Spring, 1990): 3-19.

• “Reply to Peter Mueser,” American Sociologist  21 (1, Spring 1990): 26-28.

[co-authored with Arjo Klamer] “The Rhetoric of Disagreement,”  Rethinking Marxism  2 (Fall 1989): 140-161.  Reprinted in D. H. Prychitko, ed. Why Economists Disagree, Albany: SUNY  Press, 1998.

[co-authored with Arjo Klamer] “Accounting as the Master Metaphor of Economics,” European Accounting Review  1 (1, May, 1992): 145-160.

“Agon and Ag Ec: Styles of Persuasion in Agricultural Economics,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics  72 (Dec 1990): 1124-1130.

“The Rhetoric of Economic Expertise.”  Pp. 137-147 in Richard H. Roberts and J. M. M. Good, eds., The Recovery of Rhetoric: Persuasive Discourse and Disciplinarity in the Human Sciences.  1993.  Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1993.  In French as “La rhétorique de l’expertise économique” in Vincent de Coorebyter, ed., Rhétorique de la Science Paris: Presse Universitaires de France, in the series “L’interrogation philosophique,” M. Meyer, ed., pp 171-188.

“Mere Style in Economics, 1920 to the Present,” Economic Notes  20 (1, 1991): 135-148.

“Economic Science: A Search Through the Hyperspace of Assumptions?”  Methodus  3 (1, June 1991): 6-16.  Reprinted as pp. 73-84 in Craig Freedman and Rick Szostak, eds., Tales of Narcissus–The Looking Glass of Economic Science, New York: Nova Science, 2003.   Reprinted in Geoffrey M. Hodgson, ed.,  Mathematics and Modern Economics.  Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012

• “The Arrogance of Economic Theorists” [German translation as “Die Arroganz der Wirtschaftstheorie: Okonomische Rechenkunste im Zwielicht”], Neue Zurcher Zeitung, 31 August/ 1 Sept 1991, p. 85, in the series Themen und Thesen der Wirtschaft, reprinted (in English) in Swiss Review of World Affairs 41 (no. 7, Oct 1991): 11-12.
• “Les Métaphores de la Science Economique.”  Le Monde, Apr 28, 1992, p. 39.
• “The Rhetoric of Finance,” for the New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance, 1992: 350-352.
• “Review of de Marchi and Blaug, eds., Appraising Economic Theories.”  Journal of Economic Literature  31 (1, Mar 1993): 229-231.
• “Review of Samuels, ed. Economics as Discourse.”  Journal of Economic History  53 (1, Mar 1993): 204-206
• “Review of Rosenberg’s Economics: Mathematical Politics?”  Isis  84 (4, Dec 1993): 838-39.

“How to Do a Rhetorical Analysis of Economics, and Why,” in Roger Backhouse, ed., Economic Methodology.  London: Routledge, 1994: 319-342.  Reprinted John B. Davis, ed.  Recent Developments in Economic Methodology (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006).

“Economics and the Limits of Scientific Knowledge,” in Robert Goodman and Walter Fisher, eds., Rethinking Knowledge: Reflections Across the Disciplines  (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995).

• “Fun in Econ 101, review of John Kenneth Galbraith’s A Journey Through Economic Time: A Firsthand View,” Chicago Tribune Book World, Sept 25, 1994, Sec. 14, p. 4.

“How Economists Persuade,” Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (1, June 1994): 15-32.

• “The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie, comment on Sandra Harding’s ‘Can Feminist Thought Make Economics More Objective?’,” Feminist Economics 1 (3, Fall 1995): 119-124.

“Metaphors Economists Live By,” Social Research 62 (2, Summer 1995): 215-237.  Trans. into German in Diaz-Bone, Rainer, and Gertraude Krell, eds.  Diskurs und Ökonomie: Diskursanalytische Perspektiven auf Märkte und Organisationen.  2008 VS-Verlag Wiesbaden; 2nd ed. 2015.

• “Ask What the Boys in the Sandpit Will Have,” (London) Times Higher Education  Supplement, 1996.
• “Simulating Barbara,” Feminist Economics 4 (3, Fall, 1998): 181-186.

“The Genealogy of Postmodernism: An Economist’s Guide.” Pp. 102-128 in Stephen Cullenberg, Jack Amariglio, and David F. Ruccio, eds. Postmodernism, Economics and Knowledge.  New York and London: Routledge, 2001.

• Comment on Daniel Klein’s “A Plea to Economists Who Favor Liberty,” Institute for Economic Affairs (2001)
• “Personal Knowledge.”  Preface to Stephen Ziliak, ed.  Measurement and Meaning in Economics: The Essential Deirdre McCloskey.  Brighton: Elgar.  Economists of the Twentieth Century Series.  2001.  (see Books)

“You Shouldn’t Want a Realism if You Have a Rhetoric.” 2002.  In Uskali Maki, ed. Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Rhetoric.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

“The Demoralization of Economics: Can We Recover from Bentham and Return to Smith?”  in Martha Fineman and Terence Dougherty, eds., Feminism Confronts Homo Economicus: Gender, Economics, and the Law.  Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005.

“The Trouble with Mathematics and Statistics in Economics,” History of Economic Ideas 13 (3,2005): 85-102, delivered to MUIR-PRIN project The role of mathematics in the history of economics, Venice, January 28, 2005, with replies by Dardi, Egidi, Marchionatti, and Fontana.

• {“Ethics, Milton Friedman, and the Good Old Chicago School,” presented to the History of Economics Society, meetings of the ASSA, Chicago, 2007}
• “Sliding Into PoMo-ism from Samuelsonianism: Comment on Ruccio and Amariglio, Postmodern Moments in Modern Economics,” Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society 24 (3, 2012):
• “Preface” to Lukas Kovanda, ed. The Story of a Perfect Storm and Talks with Nobel Laureates (and others) about the Financial Crisis.  Prague: Mediacop, 2010
• “Love: Love Has No Function in Samuelsonian Economics.”  Translated into German for The European: Das Debaten-Magazin, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2012), pp. 127-128 as “Liebe: Liebe hat keine Funktion”

“What Went Wrong with Economics?  A Quarter Century On.”  Pp. 574-586  in Wilfred Dolfsma and Stefan Kesting, eds., Interdisciplinary Economics: Kenneth E. Boulding’s Engagement in the Sciences.  London & New York: Routledge (Routledge series Critical Assessments of Contemporary Economists), 2013.

•  “Austrians, Anti-Samuelson, and the Rhetoric of Quantification: A Comment on Daniel Klein’s Knowledge and Coordination.”  Studies in Emergent Order 6 (2013): 1-15.

“Why Economics is on the Wrong Track.”  Pp. 211-242 in Alessandro Lantieri and Jack Vromen, eds.  The Economics of Economists: Institutional Settings, Individual Incentives, and Future Prospects.  Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2014.

(11.)  Invited replies to reviews of The Rhetoric of Economics

and to other works on the Rhetoric of Economics

[See also Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics 1994, in which many of these are reprinted.]

• “The Two Cultures and Methodology [A Reply to Mark Blaug],” Critical Review 1 (3, Summer 1987): 124-127.
• “Responses to My Critics: A Mild Response to William Butos; An Agreeable Reply to A. W. Coats; A Disagreeable Reply to Steven Pressman,” Eastern Economic Journal  13 (July-Sept 1987): 308-311.
• “Two Replies and a Dialogue on the Rhetoric of Economics” [: Rosenberg, Rappaport, and Mäki] Economics and Philosophy  4 (1988): 150-166.
• “Rhetoric as Morally Radical: Reply to Klamer, Stewart, and Gleicher,”  Review of Radical Political Economy 19 (3): 87-91.  Translated into Spanish, Estudios Economicos [El Colegio de Mexico].

“Splenetic Rationalism: Hoppe’s Review of Chapter 1 of The Rhetoric of Economics.”  Market Process  7 (1) (Spring 1989): 34-41, reprinted in Peter J. Boettke and David L. Prychitdo, eds. The Market Process: Essays on Contemporary Austrian Economics  (Edward Elgar, 1994) pp. 187-200.

“Commentary [on Rossetti and Mirowski].”  Pp. 261-271 in Neil de Macchi, ed. Post-Popperian Methodology of Economics.  Recovering Practice.  Boston: Kluwer, 1992.

• “Reply to Munz,” Journal of the History of Ideas  51 (1, Jan/Mar 1990): 143-147.
• “Modern Epistemology Against Analytic Philosophy: A Reply to Mäki,” Journal of Economic Literature 33 (Sept, 1995): 1319-1323.
• “Review of Mirowski’s Natural Images in Economic Thought: ‘Markets Read in Tooth and Claw’,” Isis, 1996.

(12.)  The Rhetoric of Inquiry

• “Exchange of Letters on The Consequences of Pragmatism,”  Times Literary Supplement, August 26, 1983.

[co-authored with Allan Megill and John Nelson] “Rhetoric of Inquiry.”  Pp. 3-18 in Nelson, Megill, and McCloskey, eds. The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences (University of Wisconsin Press, 1987).

“The Limits of Expertise: If You’re So Smart, Why Ain’t You Rich?”  The American Scholar  57 (3) (Summer 1988): 393-406.  Reprinted as pp. 92-111 in J. Lee Auspitz, W. W. Gasparski, M. K. Mlicki, and K. Szaniawski, eds.  Praxiologies and the Philosophy of Economics.  Spanish translation as “Si de verdad eras tan listo . . . (I)” in Revista de Occidente 83 (Apr 1988): 71-86.  Reprinted in B. J. Caldwell, ed. The Philosophy and Methodology of Economics, Vol. II (Edward Elgar: 1993).

• “The Very Idea of Epistemology: A Comment on Hausman and McPherson’s ‘Standards’“ Economics and Philosophy 5 (Spring 1989): 1-6.

“The Dismal Science and Mr. Burke: Economics as a Critical Theory,” pp. 99-114 in H. W. Simons and T. Melia, eds.  The Legacy of Kenneth Burke (Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989).

“Why I Am No Longer a Positivist.” Review of Social Economy 47 (3, Fall, 1989): 225-238. Reprinted as pp. 189-202 in Craig Freedman and Rick Szostak, eds., Tales of Narcissus–The Looking Glass of Economic Science, New York: Nova Science, 2003.

• “Review of Allan Bloom’s Giants and Dwarfs: Essays, 1960-1990,” Chicago Tribune Book World, Oct 1990.

“Platonic Insults: ‘Rhetorical’.”  Common Knowledge  2 (2, Fall 1993): 23-32.

”Keeping the Company of Sophisters, Economists, and Calculators,” in Fred Antczak, ed., Keeping Company: Rhetoric, Pluralism and Wayne Booth. (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1994).

• “An Economic Uncertainty Principle,” Scientific American  (Nov 1994): 107.
• “Computation Outstrips Analysis,” Scientific American  (July 1995): 26.
• “The Unquashed Masses, review of John Carey, The Intellectuals and the Masses: Pride and Prejudice among the Literary Intelligentsia 1880-1939,” Reason, 26 (3, July 1994): 60-61.
• “Big Rhetoric, Little Rhetoric: Gaonkar on the Rhetoric of Science,” in Alan G. Gross and William M. Keith, ed., Rhetorical Hermeneutics, Invention and Interpretation in the Age of Science, (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997): pp 101-112.

(13.)  The Rhetoric of Significance Testing and Econometrics

[see also chapters in The Rhetoric of Economics (Chps 8 and 9 in the 2nd ed, 1998), Chp. 2 in The Vices of Economists; The Virtues of the Bourgeoisie  1996, pp. 187-208 in How to Be Human* *Though an Economist  2000, and certain pages of The Secret Sins of Economics  2002, available on line.  And especially see Ziliak and McCloskey, The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Jobs, justice, and Lives, University of  Michigan Press, 2008]

• “The Loss Function Has Been Mislaid: The Rhetoric of Significance Tests,” American Economic Review, Supplement 75 (2, May 1985): 201-205.
• “Why Economic Historians Should Stop Relying on Statistical Tests of Significance, and Lead Economists and Historians into the Promised Land,” Newsletter of the Cliometric Society.  2 (2, Nov 1986): 5-7.
• “Rhetoric Within the Citadel: Statistics,”  pp. 485-490 in J.W. Wenzel at al., eds., Argument and Critical Practice: Proceedings of the Fifth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (Annandale, Va.: Speech Communication Association, 1987); reprinted in C. A. Willard and G. T. Goodnight, eds., Public Argument and Scientific Understanding (1993).  
• “The Bankruptcy of Statistical Significance,” Eastern Economic Journal  18 (Summer 1992): 359-361 (also in Other Brief Academic Items, [156] (2) below).

“The Art of Forecasting, Ancient to Modern Times,”  Cato Journal  12 (1, Spring/Summer 1992): 23-43.

• “The Insignificance of Statistical Significance,” Scientific American  (Apr 1995): 32-33.
• “Aunt Deirdre’s Letter to a Graduate Student” Eastern Economic Journal 23 (2, Spring 1997): 241-244.
• “Cassandra’s Open Letter to Her Economist Colleagues” Eastern Economic Journal 25 (3, Summer 1999):
• “Two Vices: Proof and Significance,” unpublished paper presented at a large AEA session in Chicago, Jan 3, 1998.}
• “Beyond Merely Statistical Significance.”  Statement of editorial policy, Feminist Economics, 2000.

[co-authored with Stephen  Ziliak] “The Standard Error of Regression.”  Journal of Economic Literature, 34 (March, 1996): 97-114.

[co-authored with Stephen Ziliak] “Size Matters: The Standard Error of Regressions in the American Economic Review during the 1990s.”  Journal of Socio-Economics 33: 527-546.  It was the subject of a symposium, pp. 547-664 with comments by Arnold Zellner, Clive Granger, Edward Leamer, Joel Horowitz, Erik Thorbecke, Gerd Gigerenzer, Bruce Thompson, Morris Altman, and others (from a presentation at the American Economic Association annual convention, January 2004, Kenneth Arrow presiding).

• [co-authored with Stephen Ziliak] “Significance Redux,”  pp. 665-675 of the symposium issue.

• [co-authored with Stephen Ziliak], “A Final Word, in the symposium issue.

[co-authored with Stephen Ziliak]  “Signifying Nothing: A Reply to Hoover and Siegler,” March, 2008, Journal of Economic Methodology

[co-authored with Stephen Ziliak]  “The Unreasonable Ineffectiveness of Fisherian ‘Tests’ in Biology, and Especially in Medicine.”  Biological Theory 4(1) 2009: 1-10.  From Chps. 14-16 in The Cult of Statistical Significance.

[coauthored with Allan Ingraham of the law firm of Labaton Sucharow LLP, principal drafter, and S. T. Ziliak] “Brief of Amicus Curiae for the Respondents” before the U.S. Supreme Court,  Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. James Siracusano and NECA-IBEW Pension Fund, Respondents, on writ of certeriori to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Nov. 12, 2010, No. 09-1156.  The case was decided in spring 2011 by a 9-0 vote in favor of our position.

• [co-authored with Stephen Ziliak] “Statistical Significance in New Tom and Old: A Reply to Thomas Mayer on Statistical Significance,” EconJournalWatch, fall 2012
• [co-authored with Stephen Ziliak] “We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing: A Rejoinder to Thomas Mayer.”  EconJournalWatch, January 2013
• Interview for web seminar Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, October 2013.

[coauthored with Stephen Ziliak] “Lady Justice v. Cult of Statistical Significance: Oomph-less Science and the New Rule of Law.”  In George DeMartino and D. N. McCloskey, eds. Oxford Handbook on Professional Economic Ethics.  New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming late 2014.

(14.)  The Rhetoric of Law

• “The Rhetoric, Economics, and Economic History of Michelman’s ‘Republican Tradition: A Commentary’,” Iowa Law Review  72 (5, July 1987): 1351-1353.

“The Rhetoric of Law and Economics,” Michigan Law Review  86 (4, Feb 1988): 752-767.

[co-authored with John Nelson] “The Rhetoric of Political Economy,” pp. 155-174 (Chapter 8) in James H. Nichols, Jr. and Colin Wright, eds. Political Economy to Economics–And Back?  (San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, 1990).

“The Essential Rhetoric of Law, Literature, and Liberty” [review of Posner’s Law as Literature, Fish’s Doing What Comes Naturally  and White’s Justice as Translation], Critical Review  5 (1, Spring 1991): 203-223.

• “Minimal Statism and Metamodernism: A Reply to Jeffrey Friedman,”  Critical Review  6 (1, Dec 1992): 107-112.

“The Lawyerly Rhetoric of Coase’s ‘The Nature of the Firm’“  Journal of Corporation Law  18 (2, Winter 1993): 424-439.

“The Rhetoric of Liberty,”  Rhetoric Society Quarterly 26 (1, 1996): pp. 9-27.

• “Review of Gaskins on Law and Rhetoric,” Social Services Review 70 (3, Sept 1996): 482-489.
• “Law, Gender, and the University,” Journal of Gender, Race and Justice 2 (1, Fall, 1998): 77-85.  Also in (19.) Gender.

[repeating as above, “Rhetoric of Significance Testing,” coauthored with S. T. Ziliak, attorney Allan Ingraham of Labaton Sucharow LLP, principal drafter, and “Brief of Amicus Curiae for the Respondents” before the U.S. Supreme Court,  November 2011.]

(15.)  Academic Policy

“The Theatre of Scholarship and the Rhetoric of Economics,”  Southern Humanities Review  22 (Summer, 1988): 241-249.

• “The Poverty of Letters: The Crushing Case Against Outside Letters for Promotion,”  Change, 20 (5, Sept 1988), pp. 7-9.
• “The Invisible Colleges and Economics: An Unacknowledged Crisis in Academic Life,”  Change 23 (6, Nov/Dec 1991): 10-11, 54.
• “A Small College Aura for Large Institutions,” Chronicle of Higher Education 38 (5, Sept 25, 1991): p. B3.
• “ Bowen and Rudenstine’s In Pursuit of the PhD: A Review Article.”  Change  26 (1, Jan/Feb 1994) and Economics of Education Review  4 (1993): pp. 359-365.

“The Public Research University in the Next Century: The Role of the Department of Communication,” Planning, 1996.

• “The Insanity of Letters of Recommendation,” Chronicle of Higher Education, Jan 2002.

(16.)  Intellectual Biography

• “Review of Robert Skidelsky’s John Maynard Keynes: Hopes Betrayed, 1883-1920,” Washington Post Book World, May 25, 1986.
• “Earl Hamilton,” in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economic Thought and Doctrine (Macmillan, 1987).
• “Charles P.  Kindleberger,” in The New Palgrave,  1987.

“Robert William Fogel: An Appreciation by an Adopted Student,” pp. 14-25 in Claudia Goldin and Hugh Rockoff, eds, Strategic Factors in Nineteenth-Century American Economic History: A Volume to Honor Robert W. Fogel.  Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

“Alexander Gerschenkron: By a Student,” The American Scholar  61 (2, Spring, 1992): 241-246.

• “Review of James Buchanan’s Better Than Plowing.” Constitutional Political Economy, 1993.

“Fogel and North: Statics and Dynamics in Historical Economics,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics  (2, 1994):       .

• “The Persuasive Life, review of Hayek on Hayek, edited by Stephen Kresge and Leif Wener,” Reason, 26 (4, August/Sept, 1994): 67-70.
• “Chicago School of Economics,” Encyclopedia of Chicago History, Spring 1999.

• “Persuade and Be Free: Review of Ebenstein’s Friedrich Hayek.”  Reason  October 2001
• “Humility and Truth in Economics, pp. 173-177 in Jack High, ed., Humane Economics: Essays in Honor of Don Lavoie.  Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006 (also in Religious Economics below).

(17.)  Sociology of Science

[see also Rhetoric of Economics above]

• “A Post-Modern Rhetoric of Sociology” (review of D. W. Fiske and R. A. Shweder, Metatheory in Social Science) Contemporary Sociology 15 (6, Nov 1986):
• “Review of Michael Mulkay’s The Word and the World: Explorations in the Form of Sociological Analysis,” American Journal of Sociology 93 (Sept 1987): 467-69.
• “A Strong Programme in the Rhetoric of Science” (review of H. M. Collins, Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Research), Journal of Economic Psychology (1986): 128-133.
• “Review of M. C. LaFollete’s Stealing into Print,” Journal of Economic Literature, 32 (Sept, 1994): 1226-29.
• {see also as cited above “My Eureka Moment: Prudence, You No Longer Rule the World,” Times Higher Education  [THE], 14 January 2010, http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=409967}

(18.) Feminist Economics

“Some Consequences of a Conjective Economics.”  Pp. 69-93 in Julie Nelson and Marianne Ferber, eds., Beyond Economic Man: Feminism and Economics.  Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.  The book was translated into Spanish Más Allá del Hombre Económico: Economía y Teoría Feminista in Ediciones Cátedra in its “Feminismos” series in 2004.

{{“What Did You Say?  A Postmodern Feminism of Economics.”  Unpublished}}

 

• “The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie, comment on Sandra Harding’s ‘Can Feminist Thought Make Economics More Objective?’,” Feminist Economics 1 (3, Fall 1995): 119-124.  (Also in part (8.) above).
• “Love and Money: A Comment on the Markets Debate,” Feminist Economics 2 (2, Summer 1996): 137-140.
• “Femmes Fiscales” (book review of women and economics)  Times Higher Education Supplement, May 31, 1996.
• {“May Days: Part of a Polylogue on Feminist Economics,”  A conversation on the FEMECON-L net, June 1994.}
• “Simulating Barbara,” Feminist Economics 4 (3, Fall, 1998): 181-186.  (Also in part (8.) above).

“Post-Modern Free-Market Feminism: A Conversation with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak.”  Rethinking Marxism Winter 2000 (12 [4]).

“Women’s Work in the Market, 1900-2000,” in Ina Zweiniger-Bargielowska, ed., Women in Twentieth-Century Britain: Economic, Social, and Cultural Change.  London: Longmans, 2001 [also in Section 6 above]

• “Cupid is no Stranger to Mammon” (review of Viviana Zelizer, The Purchase  of Intimacy), Times  Higher Education Supplement Oct 14, 2005: 24-25.
• ”Mr. Max U and the Substantive Error of Manly Economics.”  Comment on Jonung and Ståhlberg “On Gender Balance in the Economics Profession,” EconJournalWatch, 5 (2, May 2008): 32-35.

(19.) Gender Crossing

[See also Crossing: A Memoir, 1999]

• “Some News That At Least Will Not Bore You,” Eastern Economic Journal 21 (4, Fall 1995): 551-553; reprinted in Lingua Franca, early spring 1996; shortened version in Harper’s, July 1996.
• “It’s Good to be a Don if You’re Going to be a Deirdre,”  Times Higher Education Supplement, August 23, 1996, 1 page.
• “Transformation,” Iowa Alumni Quarterly, Summer 1997, p. 49.
• “Becoming Stories.”  Pp. 112-117 in Linda Roodenburg, eds., Photowork(s) in Progress/Constructing Identity.  Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1997.  (Dutch section, pp. 118-123).

{“Caring for Gender: Sister, Psychiatrists, and Gender Crossing,” Cleis Press?  I’m not sure if this piece actually came out.  A manuscript is available at the website, deirdremccloskey.org, and it seems to have some sort of samizdat life.}

“Happy Endings: Law, Gender, and the University,” Journal of Gender, Race and Justice 2 (1, Fall, 1998): 77-85 (also in [13.] The Rhetoric of Law.)

• Excerpts from Crossing: A Memoir (1999): Reason magazine, Dec 1999; Chicago Tribune Sunday Magazine, Jan 30, 2000.

• “Slate Diary, Nov 29, 1999-Dec 3, 1999″ [invited week of five diary entries, focusing on gender], slate.com., and archived, reprinted in J. Kantor, C. Krohn, and J. Shulevitz, eds., The Slate Diaries.  NY: PublicAffairs, 2000.
• “Crossing Economics.”  The International Journal of Transgenderism [a peer-reviewed electronic journal, http://www.symposium.com/ijt] 4 (3), July-Sept 2000.
• “Review of Bailey’s The Man Who Would Be Queen.” Reason November 2003 (reprinted in Independent Gay Forum¸ November 2003).
• “Letters on The Man Who Would Be Queen,” Chicago Reader Jan 2004.
• “Introduction:  Queer Markets,” pp. 83-87 in Kevin G. Barnhurst, ed., Media/Queered: Visibility and its Discontents.  New York: Peter Lang, 2007.
• “Gender Crossings,” invited op-ed piece, Toronto Globe and Mail, 800 words, September 2007
• “Politics in Scholarly Drag: Alice Dreger’s Assault on the Critics of Bailey’s The Man Who Would Be Queen,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 2008, June  (in 2015 the 10th most cited article for sexology since 2008 in Mir Siadaty-BioMedLib index).
•  “Let Manning be Chelsea.” The New Republic web edition, August 2013.

(20.)  Ethics, Bourgeois Equality, and Economics

[see also The Bourgeois Virtues, 2006, and the other books in the trilogy]

• “Review of Wayne Booth The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction,” Chicago Tribune Book World, Dec 25, 1988, Sec. 14, p. 5.

“Bourgeois Virtue,” American Scholar 63 (2, Spring 1994): 177-191.  Reprinted in Occasional Papers of the Centre for Independent Studies, New South Wales (short version reprinted in the Phi Beta Kappa Key Reporter, Fall 1994).  Reprinted in Eugene Heath, ed., Morality and the Market (McGraw-Hill, 2001)

• “Bourgeois Blues,”  Reason 25 (1, May 1993): 47-51.  Reprinted in Parth J. Shah, ed.  Morality of Markets.  Academic Foundation/ Centre For Civil Society (India).  Reprinted in Ted Lardner  and Todd Lundberg, eds., Exchanges: Reading and Writing About Consumer Culture (Longman, 2001).
• “Bourgeois Virtue,” 1000 words, pp. 44-46 in Patricia Werhane and E. R. Freeman, eds.     Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics, Blackwell: Malden, MA and London, 1997.; reprinted in second edition.  Reprinted 2014 in 3rd edition, the book having been renamed meanwhile the Wiley Encyclopedia of Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons
• “Procedural Justice,” 500 words, pp. 509-510, for Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics 1998; new edition 2004.
• “Breakthrough Books: The Market,”  Lingua Franca, July/August 1995.

{“Eighteenth-Century Virtues: Smith and Franklin.”  Presented to conferences in Australia, and New Zealand in summer 1996; a version appears as five chapters in Bourgeois Equality, the third volume in the trilogy of The Bourgeois Era}

“Missing Ethics in Economics.”  Pp. 187-201 in Arjo Klamer, ed. The Value of Culture on the Relationships Between Economics and Arts.  Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1996.

“Bourgeois Virtue and the History of P and S,”  Presidential Address, presented at the Economic History Association, New Brunswick, NJ, Sept 1997, published in The Journal of Economic History , 58 (2, June 1998): 297-317.

“The Bourgeois Virtues.”  World Economics 5, (July-September 2004): 1-16.

• “Review of Samuel Cameron.  The Economics of Sin: Rational Choice or No Choice at All?  Time Higher Education Supplement, January 2004.

Recall that {curly} brackets on whole item = not yet in print but draft available;

{{double curly}} brackets = only partially drafted, if at all.

“Not by P Alone: A Virtuous Economy,” in Irene van Staveren, ed, special issue on ethics in economics for the Review of Political Economy, 20 (2, 2008): 181-197, and chosen in July, 2013, as one of the 25 best articles published in the review over the past 25 years; reprinted in Wilfred Dolfsma and Irene van Staveren, eds., Ethics and Economics: New Perspectives.  Routledge, 2009.   Slightly revised and reprinted in: In: Cash on the Table: Anthropological Engagements with Economics and Economies, ed. Edward F. Fischer and Peter Benson.  Santa Fe: School of Advanced Research Press, 2013.

• ”The Bourgeois Virtues,” History Today ( 56, Sept, 2006): 20-27.  

• ”Bourgeois Virtues?” a 3100-word essay selected from The Bourgeois Virtues, quite different in emphasis from the previous item, Cato Policy Report, June, 2006.

“Adam Smith, the Last of the Former Virtue Ethicists.”  History of Political Economy 40 (1, 2008): 43-71; also in Jeffrey Young, ed., The Elgar Companion to Adam Smith, 2010.  Reprinted 2009 in Social Science Library: Frontier Thinking in Sustainable Development and Human Well-Being, a 2000-article set of CDs made available to 5000 universities in poor countries.

• [“Reply to David Wootton” (for his review of The Bourgeois Virtues, in the Time Literary Supplement, October, 2006.  [not intended for publication, but available on my website, deirdremccloskey.org]
• “Interview with Deirdre McCloskey, by Peter Babiak, “Saint, Sweet Talkers and the Madwoman in the Economics Department,” subTerrain 45 (5, Fall, 2006): 35-38.

“Sacred Economics, Part I: Wage Slavery” and “Sacred Economics, Part II: The Rich” (from The Bourgeois Virtues, 2006) in Sandra Peart and David Levy, eds., Street Porter and Philosopher (2008, University of Michigan Press).}

[with Jack Amariglio] “Fleeing Capitalism: A Slightly Disputatious Conversation/Interview among Friends” pp.  276-319 in Jack Amariglio, Joseph Childers, and Steven Cullenberg, eds., Sublime Economy: On the Intersection of Art and Economics, 2008, London: Routledge.  

• Review of Marglin’s The Dismal Science: How Thinking Like an Economist Undermines Community, in the Times Higher Education Supplement  27 March, 2008, 600 words.
• “Listening, Really Listening: Reply to Graafland, Binmore, and Ferber on The Bourgeois Virtues, Journal of Economic Methodology  16 (2009. No. 2): 221-232 .
• “The Economics and the Anti-Economics of Consumption” in Karin Ekstrom and Kay Glans, eds., Changing Consumer Roles, Routledge 2010.

”Life in the Market Is Good for You.” Pp.  139-168 in Mark D. White, ed., Accepting the Invisible Hand.  New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

“What Happened in Modern Economic History, and Why Economics Can’t Explain It.”  Engelsberg Seminar, Sweden, May 2010, in conference volume, 2014, 5700 words; also in Michael Zöller, ed., conference volume from Berlin meeting, May 2010.

• “My Eureka Moment: Prudence, You No Longer Rule the World,” Times Higher Education  [THE], 14 January 2010, http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=409967
• ”Liberty and Dignity Explain the Modern World,”  pp. 27-30 in Tom G. Palmer, ed., The Morality of Capitalism.  Ottawa, IL: Jameson, 2011, available on the web at http://studentsforliberty.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/The-Morality-of-Capitalism-PDF.pdf.  Reprinted in Indian edition, New Delhi, Centre for Civil Society, 2014.
• “Eine Frage der Ehre.“  Interview by Michael Wiederstein and Florian Rittmeyer.  Schweizer Monat 994 (March 2012): 14-19.
• “Bürgerliche Tugenden?“ [Bourgeois Virtues?], Schweizer Monat 997 (June 2012): 44-47.
•   “Kapitalsime,” one-page interview in the magazine of Trouw, a Dutch newspaper, 22 Dec 2012
•  “Kapitalisme is deugdzaam” (Capitalism is virtuous), Interview by Robert Dulmers, cover article in (the Netherland’s) De Groene Amsterdammer 137 (2013), no. 31, pp. 20-25.  Reprinted as “De Wereld draait ook op liefde” (“The world runs also on love”) in (Flemish Belgium’s financial newspaper) De Tijd
• {“Prudence is Max U, Distinct from Temperance: Reply to David Lipka.”  EconJournalWatch June, 2012}
• “The Great Enrichment Continues.” (1500 words), Current History 112 (November, 2013): 323-325.
•  “The Fruits of Humility, and Reading, in Economics: A Genial Reply to Don Boudreaux” Liberty Fund’s Liberty Matters online intellectual exchange. July 2014; and subsequent replies to Joel Mokyr and John Nye.  Reprinted in The Collected Liberty Matters: Nos. 1-10 (Jan. 2013 – July 2014), ed. David M. Hart and Sheldon Richman (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2014). <http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2629>.
•  “Equality Lacks Relevance if the Poor are Growing Richer.”  Financial Times. August 11, 2014.
•  “Two Kinds of Ethics of Creativity in Business,” introduction to Nils Karlson, ed.  Virtues and Entrepreneurship.  Stockholm: Ratio Institute, 2014. 4,000 words.

“It was Ideas and Ideologies, not Interests or Institutions, which Changed in Northwestern Europe, 1600-1848.”  Journal of Evolutionary Economics, forthcoming 2015.

(21.) Religious Economics

See also The Bourgeois Virtues (2006)

”Voodoo Economics.”  Poetics Today 12 (2, Summer 1991): 287-300, reprinted with minor revisions in If You’re So Smart (1990)

• “Forward” to Robert H. Nelson, Reaching for Heaven on Earth: The Theological Meaning of Economics.  Savage, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 1991, pp. xi-xvii.
• “Christian Economics?”  Eastern Economic Journal 25 (4, Fall 1999): 477-480.

“Avarice, Prudence, and the Bourgeois Virtues.”   Pp. 312-336 in William Schweiker and Charles Matthewes, eds. Having: Property and Possession in Religious and Social Life.  Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 2004

• “What Would Jesus Spend?  Why Being a Good Christian Won’t Hurt the Economy.”  In Character 1 (2004).  Linked at Wall Street Journal, OpinionJournal at http://www.opinionjournal.com/ extra/?id=110005687,  November 2004.  Reprinted in The Christian Century, May 4, 2004, pp. 24-30.  then entitled “Thrift, Economy, and God.”
• “Importing Religion Into Economics,” 2006 in Faith and Economics.

“Humility and Truth.”  Anglican Theological Review 88 (2, May 2006): 181-96.

• “Humility and Truth in Economics, pp. 173-177 in Jack High, ed., Humane Economics: Essays in Honor of Don Lavoie.  Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006.
• {{“God and Mammon,” unpublished lecture }}
•  “Reply to Eugene McCarraher.”  1100 words, May/June 2008 issue of Books & Culture
• ”The Recession: A Christian Crisis?” 500-word essay  in Christian Century, July 28, 2009.  At http://www.christiancentury.org/article.lasso?id=7392.
• “Work in the World: An Economist’s Sermon.”  Faith and Economics, Fall, 2013.  On the Australian Broadcasting Company religion website during my month in Australia, December 2013.

(22.) Political Philosophy

{“Hobbes, Rawls, Buchanan, Nussbaum, and All the Virtues}, 11,500-word essay, available]

{“The Hobbes Problem from Hobbes to Buchanan”},  First Annual Buchanan Lecture, George Mason University, April 7, 2006.  Based on previous items.  Reproduced at  http://www.gmu.edu/centers/ publicchoice/pdf{fc94e7e873e257dc0753866bc16be773f0d6c84dc4f33e443fa03ad4baf3cb3e}20links/dpaper4706.pdf]

• ”Hobbes, Nussbaum, and All Seven of the Virtues,” 1400-word comment at conference at the Institute of Social Studies, Den Haag, March 10, 2006 on “Nussbaum and Cosmopolitanism,” in a special issue of Development and Change, 37 (6), 2006, Des Gasper, ed.

“The Rhetoric of the Economy and the Polity.”  Annual Review of Political Science 14 (May/June, 2011):  181-199 at http://www.annualreviews.org/eprint/Re9E3ewhjIWwiWtpZ8tZ/full/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041309-110519

• ‘’Giving a Damn: The Missing Ethics in Political Philosophy,*  June 2011 online symposium on John Tomasi’s Free Market Fairness on the Bleeding Heart Libertarian site
• “Factual Free-Market Fairness: A Response to the Discussion of Tomasi’s Free-Market Fairness on the Bleeding-Heart Libertarian site, week of June 11, 2012,” with 350 comments and 100 or so tweets.

“What Michael Sandel Can’t Buy: Review of Sandel’s What Money Can’t Buy Claremont Review of Books.”  12 (Fall 2012): 57-59  (a longer version is “The Moral Limits of Communitarianism: What Michael Sandel Can’t Buy,” available at my website and on the web).  The longer version was reprinted (in English) in the book review section of the German journal ORDO Band 64 (spring 2013): 538-543.

(23.) Language, Humanomics, and the Economy

[with Arjo Klamer]  “One Quarter of GDP is Persuasion.”  American Economic Review 85 (2, May, 1995): 191-195.

• “A Solution to the Alleged Inconsistency in the Neoclassical Theory of Markets: Reply to Guerrien’s Reply.”  2006.  Post-Autistic Economics Review  Sept. 18 May 2007:
• “Creative Destruction vs. the New Industrial State: The “embedded” capitalism of Joseph Schumpeter and John Kenneth Galbraith.”  Review of Thomas K. McCraw, Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction and John K. Galbraith, The New Industrial State..  Manuscript of article in Reason magazine, Oct 2007.

“How to Buy, Sell, Make, Manage, Produce, Transact, Consume with Words.”  Introductory essay in Edward M. Clift, ed., How Language is Used to Do Business: Essays on the Rhetoric  of Economics.   Lewiston, NY: Mellen Press 2008

“Happyism: The Creepy New Economics of Pleasure,” cover story in The New Republic, June 28, 2012.  Among 5 “Honorable Mentions” supplementing the 16 chosen by David Brooks for a “Sidney Award” (out of 20 noted in his columns Dec 24 and Dec 27, 2012), and one of four in The New Republic mentioned, for “the best (American] magazine essays” of 2012.

• [“Die Geisteswissenschaften und die Wirtschaft] {The Humanities and the Economy} forthcoming in German, Schweizer Monat,  autumn 2012 ]
• “A Liberal and Rhetorical Reply.”  2012.  Journal of Socio-Economics (Special issue devoted to Bourgeois Dignity.   http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2012.09.002

(24.) Against Neo-Institutional Economics

See also Bourgeois Dignity (2010) and Bourgeois Equality (2015)

• “The Good Old Coase Theorem and the Good Old Chicago School: Comment on the Medema-Zerbe Paper,” Coasean Economics: The New Institutional Economics and Law and Economics, (Steven G. Medema, Ed.) Boston: Kluwer Publishing, 1997, pp. 239-248.
• “The So-Called Coase Theorem” Eastern Economic Journal  24 (3, Summer 1998): 367-371.

• “A Neo-Institutionalism of Measurement, Without Measurement: A Comment on Douglas Allen’s The Institutional Revolution.” Journal of Austrian Economics  26 (4, 2013): 262-373
•  “Getting Beyond Neo-Institutionalism: Virgil Storr’s Culture of Markets.”  5,300-word review, forthcoming in The Review of Austrian Economics 2014.

“Max U vs. Humanomics:: A Critique of Neo-Institutionalism.”  Journal of Institutional Economics Spring 2015.

(25.) Other Brief Academic Items

• “Review of Stratton and Brown’s Agricultural Records in Britain,” Journal of Economic History, c. 1978: 189.
• “Fungibility,” in The New Palgrave, 1987; reprinted New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance (Macmillan U.K.; Stockton), 1992.
• “Gresham’s Law,” for the New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance, 1992.
• “Reading the Economy.”  Humane Studies Review, 70 (2, Spring 1992): pp. 1, 10-13.
• “Duty and Creativity in Economic Scholarship,” in Michael Szenberg, ed., Passion and Craft: Economists at Work, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.  Version reprinted in Sarah Philipson, ed.  A Passion for Research, in progress 2006.

[/av_tab]
[av_tab title=’LIBROS‘ icon_select=’no’ icon=’ue800′ font=’entypo-fontello’]

[/av_tab]
[av_tab title=’PRENSA‘ icon_select=’no’ icon=’ue800′ font=’entypo-fontello’]

• Deirdre McCloskey, la profesora transexual de los “Chicago Boys”: “Yo no enseñé a llevar gente a los estadios de fútbol y dispararles”. Ver aquí.
• El hombre que quiso envejecer como mujer. Ver aquí.
• Trans: el nuevo orgullo. Ver aquí.
• Deirdre McCloskey: Sorprendente biografía en pro del libre mercado y el cambio de sexo. Ver aquí.
• Economistas, pretensiones y quehaceres. Breves notas sobre la crítica de Deirdre McCloskey a la economía modernista. Ver aquí.
• McCloskey y las predicciones en economía. Ver aquí.
• Deirdre McCloskey: “El discurso contra el capitalismo se vuelve peor después de cada crisis”. Ver aquí.
•  La contienda es “desigual”: los autores que refutan a Piketty. Ver aquí.
• Chile: capitalismo, virtudes y música electrónica. Ver aquí.

[/av_tab]
[av_tab title=’VIDEOS‘ icon_select=’no’ icon=’ue800′ font=’entypo-fontello’]
A OTRA MIRADA DE LA LIBERTAD CON DEIRDRE MCCLOSKEY
Noviembre 21, 2016/en Conferencia, Deirdre McCloskey, Video

_

[/av_tab]
[/av_tab_container]

[/av_two_third][/av_section][av_hr class=’default’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’]

[av_section min_height=” min_height_px=’500px’ padding=’default’ shadow=’no-border-styling’ bottom_border=’no-border-styling’ id=’articulos’ color=’main_color’ custom_bg=’#f2f2f2′ src=” attachment=” attachment_size=” attach=’scroll’ position=’top left’ repeat=’no-repeat’ video=” video_ratio=’16:9′ overlay_opacity=’0.5′ overlay_color=” overlay_pattern=” overlay_custom_pattern=”]
[av_one_fifth first min_height=” vertical_alignment=” space=” custom_margin=” margin=’0px’ padding=’0px’ border=” border_color=” radius=’0px’ background_color=” src=” background_position=’top left’ background_repeat=’no-repeat’]

[/av_one_fifth][av_three_fifth min_height=” vertical_alignment=” space=” custom_margin=” margin=’0px’ padding=’0px’ border=” border_color=” radius=’0px’ background_color=” src=” background_position=’top left’ background_repeat=’no-repeat’]

[av_heading tag=’h4′ padding=’10’ heading=’ARTÍCULOS RELACIONADOS’ color=” style=’blockquote modern-quote modern-centered’ custom_font=” size=’40’ subheading_active=” subheading_size=’15’ custom_class=”][/av_heading]

[/av_three_fifth][av_one_fifth min_height=” vertical_alignment=” space=” custom_margin=” margin=’0px’ padding=’0px’ border=” border_color=” radius=’0px’ background_color=” src=” background_position=’top left’ background_repeat=’no-repeat’]

[/av_one_fifth][av_one_full first min_height=” vertical_alignment=” space=” custom_margin=” margin=’0px’ padding=’0px’ border=” border_color=” radius=’0px’ background_color=” src=” background_position=’top left’ background_repeat=’no-repeat’]

[av_masonry_entries link=’category,54′ sort=’yes’ items=’4′ columns=’4′ paginate=’load_more’ query_orderby=’date’ query_order=’DESC’ size=’flex’ gap=’large’ overlay_fx=” caption_elements=’title excerpt’ caption_display=’always’ id=” orderby=” order=”]

[/av_one_full]
[/av_section]

[av_one_full first min_height=” vertical_alignment=” space=” custom_margin=” margin=’0px’ padding=’0px’ border=” border_color=” radius=’0px’ background_color=” src=” background_position=’top left’ background_repeat=’no-repeat’][/av_one_full]